« Misuse of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve | Main | Impeachment: This is Getting Out of Hand »
August 29, 2005
9/11: Still Not the Jews' Fault
An 11 year old turns an art project into a political statement by showing Bush referring to seeing the first plane crash into the World Trade Center. The contest was organized by the San Francisco Chapter of the 911 Truth Alliance, which the main organization distributed literature that suggests Israel and/or the Mossad were responsible for 9/11. There seems to be no end of those who espouse bizarre conspiracy theories linked Bush, the Mossad, Saudis, short sellers, and insurance companies with the 19 people who actually did hijack the planes on 9/11.
With the breaking news on Able Danger one wonders if the conspiracy theories will have to be rewritten. The Clinton Administration "wall of separation" prevented the military from sharing critical information that would have prevented 9/11 years before it happened. Even when some tried to share the information anyway, the information went ignored. It looks like more and more that terrorists did hijack planes and that the CIA dropped the ball long before Bush even hit office.
The conspiracy theorists will have you believe bizarre theories about the international neocon conspiracy (closely related to the international Zionist conspiracy) but a review of the facts once again shows that radical Islamic terrorists are targeting this country, the Clinton Administration did nothing about it, and they'll keep attacking until they are stopped. Iraq is the latest front and only victory there will provide protection against future attacks.
Blogs talking about this: PowerBlog!, Strate Sphere, Captain's Quarters, et al.
Posted by John Bambenek at August 29, 2005 4:25 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://jcb.pentex-net.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/741
Comments
I agree. I read other blogs and it astounds me how analyzing how the President reacted when he found out on 9/11 is considered critical thinking. Meanwhile, a Constitution is being written in Iraq. Bizarre.
Posted by: the commentator at August 30, 2005 3:52 PM
I partly agree with your statements. One question we should ask is, was Richard Clarke aware of Able Danger? Remember, Shaffer said DoD lawyers prevented the transfer of intel to the FBI, not to Clarke. Also, Shaffer said: "...the lawyers didn't allow us to properly go after either by intelligence collection or by [...] allowing the FBI to go out, to look at these guys..." ( http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/08/22/terror/main790623.shtml )
Both ways, these lawyers apparently blocked the intel transfer AND regular operations.
Able Danger was alledgedly terminated in Feb 2001 ( http://www.timesherald.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=15032471&BRD=1672&PAG=461 ). I just wonder if it's possible to shut down a DIA operation which handles very sensitive intel, without knowing the substance of it.
Posted by: Covert 2 Overt Analysis at August 30, 2005 7:43 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)
